Talk:Cash-flow diagram

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Cash-flow diagram. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070710065716/http://www.lehigh.edu:80/~rhs2/IBE098/CashFlow&Interest.ppt to http://www.lehigh.edu/~rhs2/IBE098/CashFlow&Interest.ppt

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:45, 16 November 2016 (UTC)

Requested move 22 February 2019

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Not moved: consensus not to move, 's merger is being discussed at the appropriate venue. (closed by non-admin page mover)  SITH   (talk)   19:04, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Cash-flow diagram → Cash flow diagram – Consistency with Cash flow and Cash flow statement. Qzekrom (talk) 18:07, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 19:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)


 * Oppose. In this case, "cash-flow" is a compound modifier, so per MOS:HYPHEN it should be hyphenated. Otherwise it might be interpreted as a flow diagram which is cash, rather than a diagram which is cash-flow. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 19:36, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * What about Cash flow statement? If that's the case, we should move that page as well. Qzekrom (talk) 20:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think we should. Thanks &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 22:06, 22 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose Cash flow statement should be retitled to Cash-flow statement; this one should not be changed. UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:28, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose per Amakuru, but more importantly, ...
 * Merge and redirect to Cash flow. The sources are broken links, the article is a virtual orphan, and it is an extremely thin slice subtopic of cash flow.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:07, 24 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I have proposed to merge both Cash flow and Cash-flow diagram into Cash flow statement. Cash flow and Cash-flow diagram are both very thin, barely watched, edited or downloaded thin slice forks of Cash flow statement.  See Talk:Cash flow statement.  --SmokeyJoe (talk) 08:15, 24 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.