Talk:Cash for comment affair

Untitled
"after he had been found to have been less than impartial in his role in "cash for comment" investigations" - obviously the letters to Jones were highly inappropriate, but was there actually an official finding to this effect? If so, the organisation making that finding should be identified; if not, this bit should be reworded to avoid giving that impression. --Calair 10:08, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

Incorrect reference
Reference [1] should read Flew, Terry... I cannot seem to edit the article to correct this error. Please remember WP:BITE! See http://eprints.qut.edu.au/19259/ for a citation of this article. --LavaDimNylons 03:07, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
 * In this case the quickest way to find the word needing fixing would of been to search for it and then replace it. My browser allows this by pressing Crtl + F to find in page.  Hope that tips helps and thanks for pointing out the error, no matter how minor. - Shiftchange (talk) 03:26, 22 February 2013 (UTC)


 * That's the thing- I couldn't find it by the usual means. Cheers for the reversion.LavaDimNylons (talk) 03:30, 22 February 2013 (UTC)