Talk:Cassel, Nord/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Shearonink (talk · contribs) 14:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

I am Reviewing this article for possible GA status. Shearonink (talk) 14:19, 3 February 2017 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * I think the "Sights and cultures" list should be converted to prose. It's almost prose already, just needs some adjusting.Shearonink (talk) 03:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for adjusting this section. Shearonink (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * Ran the copyvio tool, no problems found. Shearonink (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * No edit wars found. Shearonink (talk) 03:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * Several of the images are lacking the US public domain tag. Shearonink (talk) 15:30, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Please refer to "Images" section below. Shearonink (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * NIcely-done. Shearonink (talk) 03:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Finishing up this Review is On hold pending the US public domain tags issues in the "Images" section below. Shearonink (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Everything has been adjusted to my satisfaction & according to the GA Criteria. Shearonink (talk) 18:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Please refer to "Images" section below. Shearonink (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * NIcely-done. Shearonink (talk) 03:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Finishing up this Review is On hold pending the US public domain tags issues in the "Images" section below. Shearonink (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Everything has been adjusted to my satisfaction & according to the GA Criteria. Shearonink (talk) 18:21, 19 February 2017 (UTC)

Non-reviewer comments
I would convert the Sights and culture section to prose. The embedded list is awkward and unnecessary (WP:PROSE). – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 17:14, 4 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Shearonink (talk) 03:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)
 * OK, I've done this now. Prioryman (talk) 13:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

Read-throughs
I will be doing a few more deep read-throughs to see if there's anything I missed but - other than converting the one section from List to Prose - so far I haven't really found found much of any great concern. Shearonink (talk) 03:19, 5 February 2017 (UTC)

Images
The following 3 images lack the US public-domain tag and must be updated with that information before I can finish this GA Review: Thanks, Shearonink (talk) 23:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)
 * File:The battle between the Flemish and the French at Cassel.jpg
 * File:ND - CASSEL - Grande-Place. Jour de Marché.JPG
 * File:Van Eecke 100 MTIL - MONT-CASSEL - Vue générale - Les Moulins.JPG
 * Have you had a chance to finish up the public-domain tags for these 3 images? Shearonink (talk) 16:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Yep, all done now - thanks. Prioryman (talk) 09:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)