Talk:Cassini–Huygens/GA1

Good Article Reassessment
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.''

Good Article Sweeps: Delisted
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I believe the article currently has several issues that need to be addressed, and as a result, I have delisted the article. Multiple sections in the article are lacking citations. Add additional citations from a variety of sources to provide a balanced representation of the information present. Perhaps sources can be pulled from the main articles linked to within the article. Look to books, magazines, newspaper articles, other websites, etc. The update tag also needs to be addressed, it's been there for several months now. The citations would benefit with formatting, they should in addition to include the title contain author, date, publisher, access date, etc. (the citation templates at WP:CITET can help with formatting). The article also has multiple dead links that need to be fixed (the Internet Archive may be able to help). Although the article has been delisted, the article can be returned to GA status by addressing the above points and giving the article a good copyedit. Once sources are added and cleanup is done, I recommend renominating the article at WP:GAN. If you disagree with this assessment, a community consensus can be reached at WP:GAR. If you need clarification or assistance with any of these issues, please contact me on my talk page and I'll do my best to help you out. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 04:20, 18 July 2009 (UTC)