Talk:Castelo de Vide

cause I don't know, Kezz

why is there no castle in Castelo de Vide? i had a class asignment and i could not do it because I could not find anything about the castle Castelo de Vide!! I went to google and typed in as much stuff as I could and I couldn't find it. All I could find was that it was built the year of 1299. aahhhhhhhh!!!!!!!! So I would appreciate if you would try to make another page about the castle in Castelo de Vide. Thanks, Kezz

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Castelo de Vide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071023043630/http://www.brunotereso.net/blog/?page_id=199 to http://www.brunotereso.net/blog/?page_id=199&file=Trips%2FPortugal%2FCasteloVide%2F

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:31, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Fort São Roque into Castelo de Vide
Provided sources, as well as what I was able to find on Google Scholar, only cover Fort Sao Roque in the broader context of the landmarks of Castelo de Vide, suggesting that it should be covered as a section in this article. signed,Rosguill talk 19:22, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * I disagree. Plenty of smaller landmarks than this one have their own pages, and I see no reason why a proper star-fort shouldn't have it's own page like the rest do. The goal is precisely to provide every fort in Portugal with its own article. Wareno (talk) 04:05, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Since there was no movement on this discussion, I've moved the article to draft, until enough sourcing can be included to meet notability criteria. Onel 5969  TT me 13:38, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Closing the merge discussion, given the uncontested objection and no support; improved referencing (now in the draft) seems to be the last position reached. Klbrain (talk) 08:03, 6 August 2023 (UTC)