Talk:Castlevania: Harmony of Dissonance/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I'll be reviewing this article throughout the next few days. The Good Article criteria are posted below for reference. As I see that the article passes a particlular piece of the criteria, it will be updated with a symbol. The second section below is where I will post my comments. I will continue to post things I find throughout the next few days until I state I'm finished finding issues, however, anyone may choose to start fixing these issues at any time. --Teancum (talk)

GA-Class criteria
For further detail, see WP:WIAGA


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Issues

 * player-character should be player character
 * "Harmony of Dissonance makes use of the forward dash move" -- "the forward dash" should be "a forward dash"
 * "role-playing games (RPG)" -- (RPG) is not necessary unless you refer to it as such later in an article
 * The Reception section relies very heavily on quotations. Please limit those, and summarize what has been said.
 * Some references list the publisher as IGN, others IGN.com -- these need to all be marked as IGN
 * "Game Informer" as a publisher in Ref 38 should be italicized. It's also a dead link, so if you can get an archived version from www.archive.org that would be best.
 * Publishers should only be wikilinked for the first reference. Every other reference after that should not be.

DONE - I didn't find much. Good job! Let me know when you've addressed these.

I've marked issues that have been addressed. --Teancum (talk) 12:22, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Reviewer: Teancum (talk) 12:23, 27 September 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for taking the time to review the article. I tried to limit the quotes in the reception and I think that all of the issues have been addressed now. Kaguya-chan (talk) 20:14, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

All issues have been accounted for. PASS  -- Great job! --Teancum (talk) 20:47, 29 September 2010 (UTC)