Talk:Casualty 1907

Merge?
Someone's suggested merging this article with Casualty 1906 and I kinda agree. I mean they are kinda the same even though they're set in different years, and (especially at the moment anyway) there doesn't seem to be much info, plotwise) for either series. If that makes sense. londonsista  | Prod  22:33, 16 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, that was me, but I was in a rush and wasn't able to follow up the tagging here at the time. Considering we're looking at just four episodes in total, it's a bit extravagant to have two pages. Waking the Dead (TV series) is a a good model for how a combined page should be. Nick Cooper (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't think so, because casualty 1906 was meant to be a one off and then it was decided to to make a follow up. Furthermore what would the page be called? So I think it would only cause confusion. Jamesplummett (talk) 14:17, 18 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I agree. Why not start with a disambiguation page, that directs to c1906, c1907, c1909 and the one(s) who may/ will follow? After the definte end, then its time to decide to merge into a "casualty row". (no account, sorry) --92.226.197.181 (talk) 07:24, 18 February 2010 (UTC)

What's the likelihood there'll be a Casualty 1908 next year? Suggest merging content into Casualty 1906 and creating appropriate redirects to there. Frickative (talk) 19:38, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but the DVD release of 1906, 1907 and 1909 is simply titled Casualty 1900s. A possible title for a merged article? Bradley0110 (talk) 14:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

FWIW, these are broadcast in Australia (on UKTV) as series 1, 2 and 3 of "London Hospital" (http://www.uktv.com.au/programmes/show.asp?id=385 as at 31 July 2009) 122.107.80.75 (talk) 07:12, 31 July 2009 (UTC)