Talk:Cat and mouse

Cat and Mouse is a common game where you try not to make noise and steel the cheese. If you get caught you are a kitten and try distract people and make noise. so you can help the cat catch the mice.If mice gets the cheese and gets back to starting position they win. That is the common rules to cat and mouse

Would this be considered self-promotion?
If nobody objects I will post it and see what happens.--Guy vandegrift (talk) 17:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)


 * If it helps "spread the word" about creating quizzes for Wikipedia articles, I will be happy to write a quiz on this article. I will even place a question from it on exams in one of my college courses.  See v:Category:Wikiversity quizzes placed on Wikipedia.--Guy vandegrift (talk) 15:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

The second paragraph needs a rewrite
"Theoretical active reading on 'cat and mouse,' or 'Dot and Ditto' is ominous in its implication; multiple protagonists, each armed a passive strategy, can remain theoretically locked in total perpetual war indefinitely, wholly unable to rise to a plateau sufficient to intellectualize their plight.[citation needed]"

This is the worst, most pretentious sentence I've read in a long time. What does it mean? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:14a:c001:bc44:3463:dd93:ee0a:12c1 (talk) 09:50, 17 February 2019 (UTC)


 * The editor failed to correctly link the relevant articles within Wikipedia and no citations are there (for 8 years now) to help a lesser being like me understand what was meant, so I have taken the liberty of simply removing the paragraph as a re-write is borderline impossible.--XV-E-DCI (talk) 20:30, 10 March 2024 (UTC)

examples?
should this have a list of examples? G Rich 02 (talk) 02:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC)