Talk:Catch 21/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 07:37, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

I will have a look at this article. MWright96 (talk) 07:37, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:


 * no dab links

Infobox

 * Amend wikilink Las Vegas Gambit to Gambit (game show)

Lead

 * Add the reception the show has received into the lead.

Main Game

 * The final part of the second paragraph is missing a reference.

Production

 * "with some episodes featuring celebrities with a common bond playing for charity." - with some episodes featuring celebrities with a common bond of playing for charity.