Talk:Catch a Fire (film)

Differences from Real Life
http://www.twosisters.org.za/patricks-story.html

should be contrasted - BUT this is one source and I cannot see how accurate it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.113.96.60 (talk) 10:32, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Untitled
Budget source = http://www.moviehole.net/interviews/20061024_exclusive_interview_philip_noy.html

Fair use rationale for Image:CatchAFire(film).jpg
Image:CatchAFire(film).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 13:19, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Use of the term "terrorist" to describe the protagonist and the primary subjects of the film
As there is a specific intent by the members of the ANC (including the main protagonist) to commit acts of sabotage that take measures in order not to harm innocents: the term saboteur seems more appropriate.

Most definitions of Terrorism refer specifically to violence against individuals and innocents. In the film, the leadership at the ANC camp specifically instructs the protagonist not to harm innocents in the course of committing the intended act of sabotage.

The word terrorist was used by the Apartheid government to alienate the ANC and is politically loaded. In the context of the film description the word terrorist should be replaced by another term that is more accurate and politically neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.138.165.236 (talk) 08:26, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Use of “forgiveness” in plot section is factually incorrect
"Revenge is not good" and "let him live" (referring to Vos) are the preconditions that Chamusso states for being free (the subject of freedom being “we”). GeorgBauhaus (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 02:51, 20 October 2012 (UTC)