Talk:Category of finite-dimensional Hilbert spaces

inaccurate
The above description does not seem accurate -- the arrows should be *unitary* transformations or *contractions.* Otherwise, this is none other than the category of finite dimensional vector spaces.


 * Actually, I added 'between them' thus, it must satisfies some properties w.r.t. the form. This (unitary maps or contraction) should be added in the 'properties' list and defined w.r.t. the dagger-monoidal structure. Moreover, discussion should *not* take place in the article but here.

Shouldn't it be _complex_ finite dimensional Hilbert spaces for it to form a monoidal category? What is the tensor unit otherwise? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Iratsu (talk • contribs) 15:52, 4 August 2009 (UTC)


 * All of the above issues seem to have been fixed long ago. User:Linas (talk) 18:46, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

"Finite dimensional hilbert spaces" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Finite_dimensional_hilbert_spaces&redirect=no Finite dimensional hilbert spaces] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. 1234qwer1234qwer4 18:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)