Talk:Catfish Dispute

Comments
Overall an effective summary of the issue. Some sections could be phrased better: "the relationship between the US and Vietnam was eventually brightened up "). Check your grammar. Think about how you could phrase a sentence such as "In particular, the CFA claimed that catfish from Vietnam was poor quality and biologically not catfish" better. The See Also section is a nice touch. Rugbyhuman (talk) 06:02, 27 April 2015 (UTC)

The article describes very well the main points of the issues. Found a few grammar errors but nothing that couldn't be fixed. Good job! Rodricastiglioni (talk) 02:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Catfish Dispute. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150425082657/http://vietnam.usembassy.gov/econ12.html to http://vietnam.usembassy.gov/econ12.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 04:43, 1 August 2017 (UTC)