Talk:Cathodic protection rectifier

There was discussion of a merge with cathodic protection, but I disagreed and have been slowly addeing to the article. If Wtshymanski has a problem with duplicate info being in two places, merging while the article is being improved will only complicate the the process for editors with intimate knowledge of the topic but not so much of Wikipedia merging and deletion rules. Cafe Nervosa (talk) 01:59, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * It just seems an odd and fragmentary way to discuss a subject, by sprinkling the content over many articles instead of discussing everything relevant in an organized fashion in one place. It'd be like separate articles on "Steering wheel" and "Rear view mirror" and no coherent discussion at "Automobile". The only place a cathodic protection rectifier is used is in a cathodic protection system; it's not like the subject has any notability outside of the field of cathodic protection. --Wtshymanski (talk) 13:11, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Wtshymanski, please take to heart the criticism leveled in your direction regarding deleting the work of others. I started this article and it was never a stub.  Please relent.Cafe Nervosa (talk) 17:11, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
 * Forgive me for thinking an article should be a unified and comprehensive view of a subject. I keep mistaking this for an encyclopedia. --Wtshymanski (talk) 18:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)