Talk:Caudry's Case

Prod
If others decide it would benefit this project to delete this article, the High Commission for Ecclesiastical Causes would certainly pass scrutiny for an article (how is it we don't have one yet?) and it would be of value for this to lead to that article, once it is written, because it is a topic that someone might search for looking for more information. That is, after all, how I came to be made aware that we did not have an article yet on the subject. If you ask me - deleting it will not serve much purpose. Ben Azura (talk) 22:22, 10 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I'll take a look at the sources you've added here. Has this case been discussed at length in any of the sources you've found? All I've been able to find are brief mentions of the case and citations.
 * I've not looked into the High Commission for Ecclesiastical Causes, but seems like an interesting subject. If you start a draft, I would be happy to take a look. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:28, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Well, yes. There are multiple Caudry's that were the subject of cases. I don't want to add anything that is wrong and rushing isn't going to help. The sources are - I don't know why you would want to look at them, but if it's something your interested in, have at it. Ben Azura (talk) 22:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)