Talk:Causing a Commotion/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer:  Gongshow  Talk 03:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:


 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * Again, not much is needed to pass GA. Let me know if you have any questions.  Gongshow  Talk 03:24, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the review. I went ahead and corrected all. --Legolas  ( talk 2 me ) 03:53, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * That was quick! Looks great, and I have passed the article. Congrats again on your terrific work.  Gongshow  Talk 07:25, 27 May 2010 (UTC)