Talk:Cdc14

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lled1988.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 18:45, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Critique of Cdc14 article
The facts are appropriately referenced. Majority of the references are from primary, secondary or tertiary literature. This makes them reliable and acceptable. The entire article is relevant to the topic. There are fundamentals describing the function of the cdc14. The article is neutral and all the information is non-biased and the information is based on simple facts from previous research on the protein. There are no claims or frames which are heavily biased. The information is from neutral sources. The sources are belonging to scientific literature and subsequently are scientifically neutral. The viewpoints about the protein are simple based on facts and are adequately represented. The links to the citations work perfectly well. The article is devoid of any noticeable plagiarism and also does not have any close paraphrasing. There is lot of information that could be updated. Lled1988 (talk) 02:36, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Cdc14 protein information - Figures and Tables
Most of the articles on protein have information on the protein in the form of a table (usually on the right hand side). The information usually includes a cartoon or an image of the protein representing all of its secondary structures like alpha-helices, beta-sheets, coiled coil loops. There should be links to Protein database bank (PDB) id, information on identifiers, Gene ontology data, RNA expression pattern, information on orthologs; links for protein information about several databases such as ensemble, uniprot, RefSeq. This subsection should be included in the article. There are also links to Wikidata, where the information could be edited on proteins from model organisms and humans. The protein is involved in several signaling pathways in cell-cycle. There should be figures and images describing its functions in the biological processes. These figures would complement the written facts in the Wikipedia page. Lled1988 (talk) 02:44, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Cdc14 article - structure formatting and subsections
Many of the articles in Wikipedia on proteins have a particular structure to present the information. They have subsections such as structure, function, regulation and interactions, clinical significance among others. This format is missing in Cdc14 article. Although there are subsections but it would be better to add more subsections to make it easily understandable for the audience. although, sufficient information is provided in its evolution and its role in various species of yeast, it is more easy to interpret when there are in separate sections. Also, most of the articles on proteins have information on protein family, the location of the loci on chromosome, its activators and inhibitors. There should also be mention on the various domains through which cdc14 regulates it activity and how the regulation of cdc14 is controlled by other proteins.Lled1988 (talk) 02:56, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

Critique of Cdc14 article - 2
The lead section in the article briefly summarizes the key points. However, the first sentence should have included what Cdc14 was. It should have begun something like...Cdc14 is a gene (protein symbol...) which plays a critical role in mitosis. The first sentence mentions about the the scientist Dr. Hartwell but there is no link to his Wikipedia page. The structure of the article is clear. However, it would be better to include more sections like structure, function, regulation and interactions, clinical significance among others. The article appears to be well balanced as there is talk about function of Cdc14, expression of Cdc14 across various species, defects arising out of Cdc14 knockout and other features. The article has neutral coverage as most of the data presented in the article is based on facts and appropriate references are being provided. The language in the article is scientifically acceptable and unbiased. The article has references from reliable sources. These include publications from reputed and acceptable journals such as Nature, Science and others. Also, the article does not have warning banner. The lead section is free of language problems. It is devoid of unsourced opinions and value sections. It does not have references to unknown groups of people. However, the section on cellular function should be divided and in the current state is overly long. Lled1988 (talk) 03:21, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

Typo
In "The abnormality arises due to delay in dissembling of spindle during Anaphase I." is this just a typo for disassembling, or a typo for something else, genes don't lie do they?  Ϣere Spiel  Chequers  12:09, 18 November 2018 (UTC)