Talk:Cecelia Holland

Untitled
Okay. I've done a bunch of copyediting on other folks' pages, I've added to and enhanced other pages, but this is the first (major) article I've posted from scratch. I know a lot about this author, both personally and critically, and I need some guidance regarding how much interpretative criticism is "allowed" without seeming to lose the NPOV. My comments are a distillation of reading a very large number of reviews over several decades (I'm a librarian in a large urban system with a major involvement in collection development); for that reason, I would be hard put to attribute a particular critique to a particular source. But I've tried to exclude my own personal tastes and favorites. At the same time, simply saying "American author, wrote these books" doesn't seem to do any service to the reader.

I haven't been able to find a discussion anywhere on the subject of "averaged out" literary criticism vs. NPOV. Any suggestions?


 * Michael K. Smith 17:31, 24 Jun 2004 (UTC)


 * I'd suggest that 'her style is impeccable' is transparently not encyclopaedic or NPOV. "Simply saying "American author, wrote these books" doesn't seem to do any service to the reader." Perhaps, but that is not an excuse to then insert some of your personal views. It is not a choice between your personal praise and having not evaluative material whatsoever. Rather, if what you say about her style is correct, it stands to reason she will have received similar praise from other sources (reviews) and these sources may be quoted with the correct citations along with any dissenting opinions. As it stands this article is a hymn to a certain author by Michael K Smith, not an encyclopedic entry upon the author and what praise, if any, she has received from significant literary figures. 94.193.220.27 (talk) 02:33, 5 January 2012 (UTC)


 * I have attempted to improve the neutrality of the article, by the removal of the most grossly non-encyclopedic words and phrases. Really, what it needs, if any comment on her style is to be made, is some quotations from proper literary critics.  I have seen articles DELETED for less blatant bias.  oh, and I LIKE her work a lot.

IceDragon64 (talk) 00:14, 24 January 2012 (UTC)