Talk:Celia Newman

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Celia Newman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090107012819/http://www.house.state.tx.us/members/dist124/bio/menendez.htm to http://www.house.state.tx.us/members/dist124/bio/menendez.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:11, 17 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Celia Newman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added tag to http://www.the-artists.org/ArtistView.cfm?id=FD45051F-1372-5329-667880CACEA9B6DE
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081120192153/http://www.documentakassel.com/2008/07/07/ to http://www.documentakassel.com/2008/07/07/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:46, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Contested deletion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (your reason here) --User: Cehlia Newman-MenéndezChukkerTime (talk). 22:02, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Did you mean to tag this page with db-person? Speedy deletions only apply if every revision of the page meets the criteria; in this case there is a previous revision to roll back to. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  14:02, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

The current state of the article satisfies my objection. Thanks. Dhpage (talk) 18:16, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Edits to the page that reference unreliable sources
There is some edit warring going on right now by some conflict of interest editors adding back in poorly sourced information, and reverting back to previous versions of the article. Wikipedia editors usually follow the "BRD" cycle - which means "Boldly edit", but if it gets "Reverted", then "Discuss". Since these additions have been reverted (multiple times now), there should be a discussion before adding them back in (they are obviously contested, and Wikipedia is based around discussion and consensus).

My main problems with the edits are this: There needs to be reliable sources used for this information - IMDB is not considered reliable by Wikipedia standards (and community consensus), because it is largely user-generated rather than fact-checked (please read WP:RSP's section on "IMDB" for more explanation). If there are published sources that are independent of the subject, and have a reputation for fact-checking, then they can be used instead. But since the information has been removed, it should not be added back in without a reliable source. Also, conflict of interest editors should really make suggestions on the talk page instead of editing the page themselves. This can be done by starting a new section on this talk page and adding at the top, along with your suggested edits and citations.

I mostly added this section here to give more context to the recent reversions by various users, and as a way to kick off the "Discuss" part of WP:BRD. - Whisperjanes (talk) 01:38, 24 September 2020 (UTC)