Talk:Celier Xenon 4

C-44
I removed the C-44 as this is built by a different manufacturer and despite looking like a Xenon, there is nothing in the ref cited that indicates it is a Xenon variant. I think before we add more claims we really need to find a ref that explains the relationship between Celier and Argo. - Ahunt (talk) 13:15, 27 August 2023 (UTC)


 * "The C-44 is t is manufactured in the European Union - Poland.
 * It is truly an engineering work of art, built on the legacy of the Xenon."
 * they don't mention if it is the Xenon 2 or 4 FSbiran (talk) 15:08, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * built on the legacy of the Xenon does not really state that it is a Xenon variant. The wording is pretty vague. It is possible it is a new design was "inspired by" the previous design, a copy, or a derivative, or even just trying to connect to publicity for the previous model. Unless we have something more definitive it is not really clear it is a variant and thus should be in this article. I have no issues with a new article on the C-22, though, if there are third party refs on it to comply with WP:GNG. - Ahunt (talk) 15:17, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jUgzSniVEXE
 * interesting, but what is flyARGO now? FSbiran (talk) 21:41, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Odd. The decal on the gyro says "FlyArgo Rotorcraft Center" in English, which makes it sound like a flying school. The aircraft has an "SP" registration, which is Poland, so I presume it was shot in Poland. More questions than answers. - Ahunt (talk) 21:59, 29 August 2023 (UTC)