Talk:Cell Signaling Technology

Other than the intro paragraph, all other entries provide valid references to back-up the information provided. Many I ask what the main issue is in dealing with this entry? Misull (talk) 20:54, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
 * It sounds like a marketing brochure. Most of the references are actually to press releases. Those that are not are not really about the company, they are about an office building, or about something that Cell Signaling Technology donated money to. Those references don't help establish notability. - MrOllie (talk) 20:58, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

I have update the entry by removing various descriptions and updating references where possible, please let me know if this is sufficient. Misull (talk) 21:21, 4 March 2011 (UTC)