Talk:Celsius Network

Non-primary sources needed
Particularly concerning the downfall and bankruptcy, most of the information has been sourced from Celsius or its executives directly. These primary sources are valuable and should be backed up with secondary sources to verify the information, both for importance and factual accuracy. I have deleted some passages that cite two primary sources and express an opinion about the company or its founder (e.g., statement A contradicts statement B, therefore the company has lied). This is synthesis, a form of original research, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. Please cite such connections to reliable secondary sources. White 720 (talk) 15:21, 15 July 2022 (UTC)

Examiner’s report
The Celsius examiner’s report is out, and according to this analysis by Molly White, it contains some rather unflattering things about the company and its leadership. https://newsletter.mollywhite.net/p/the-celsius-examiners-report-a-picture White 720 (talk) 01:24, 3 February 2023 (UTC)