Talk:Cent-gardes Squadron

Caricature in the lead
Transfered from User talk:DITWIN GRIM :
 * ...And the inappropriate caricature in the drawing is Verly. Now, don't disrupt the article just because you don't like it. Instead, go to Verly's article and expand or reference it in a more productive way like Buistr did, and learn how to work together. Third, this is not a wrestling competition so don't treat other users as if they were your age, because they're not. I don't wanna go back to this again ! Krenakarore TK 09:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Seriously what was that ???
 * Who the hell are you to give good points and bad points to Wikipedia users ? Who are you to pretend that I’m disrupting the article or that I’m being unproductive ?
 * Wikipedia doesn't need you and you're the one who is disrupting this article, as you don’t respect Manual of style, so please keep your advices for yourself.
 * Your arguments are just irrelevant. The caricature of a Cent-Garde could be appropriate in a "Cent-Garde in popular culture" paragraph, but is inappropriate in the lead as per WP:IRELEV, just like this picture would be inappropriate to illustrate Napoleon's article lead. DITWIN GRIM (talk) 12:20, 11 March 2012 (UTC)


 * I am the user who created the article. You, the user who uses expressions like: Who the hell are you? Second, you didn't understand what you read: Images must be relevant to the article that they appear in and be significantly and directly related to the article's topic. Therefore, the fact that it is a caricature of a Cent-Garde officer does not disqualify it for the lead or any other section. It is thoroughly relevant to the context of the article in which it appears (Cent-Gardes were constantly caricatured by artists like Draner, who now lost its link from the article Cent-Gardes because of you.) !
 * No more reverting. Go find sth useful for you to do. Krenakarore  TK 13:43, 11 March 2012 (UTC)
 * You may have created this article, but this doesn’t give you any rights over this article, as Wikipedia is a collaborative project. Neither are you entitled to judge the quality of other users' contributions. However, the new picture is perfectly fine to me, so I won’t further feed the diva. DITWIN GRIM (talk) 16:32, 11 March 2012 (UTC)