Talk:Center for Class Action Fairness

Requested edit
Might someone update this wildly out of date article? This American Lawyer profile has more up to date statistics and accounts of more important victories than the ones listed here; Ars Technica wrote a nice piece about CCAF, too. We won the Dewey case mentioned in the last paragraph. Reuters; NJLJ; Forbes.

If some is more ambitious than that, there is a large list of sources at http://tedfrank.com/press, including WSJ (reprinted here); Forbes; Litigation Daily; Corporate Counsel; Wall Street Journal; Legal Intelligencer; Forbes; Forbes; WSJ; ABA Journal; Fortune; Reuters; Litigation Daily; Wall Street Journal.

Many thanks. Theodore H. Frank (talk) 16:22, 6 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Same as the other article. Request Edit is not the proper venue to just ask for an article to be updated generally as most of our articles could use updating and expansion. However, if you do not have a conflict of interest, you can update it yourself. You can also offer contnet for consideration or simply improve other articles. However, it's not really helpful to just point out that the article is outdated. CorporateM (Talk) 16:44, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

NPOV problems
This article focuses too much on CCAF-promotional material; this may need to be reevaluated in the light of how CCAF is portrayed in the sources. The three quoteboxes quoting Ted Frank at length also seem egregious. RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 02:42, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

A "project of Donors Trust"?
What does that mean? The no-longer-accessible article may say that, but the first reference only says that it was initially funded by Donors Trust. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:10, 10 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Center for Class Action Fairness. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090917033157/http://abovethelaw.com/2009/08/ted_frank_interview.php to http://abovethelaw.com/2009/08/ted_frank_interview.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:20, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Delisted
A procedural delist as the article is now a redirect. AIRcorn (talk) 08:52, 20 April 2018 (UTC)