Talk:Center for Human-Compatible Artificial Intelligence

I'd recommend doing a db-author deletion, I can't find sufficient sources to merit inclusion as its own separate article.


 * The article from The Guardian is a reliable source because it is significant, independent, reliable, and secondary. The article was published in the main technology section of the news service, and per here, the author is "a senior technology reporter for Guardian US in San Francisco."


 * The Norris article is also clearly significant and secondary. I argue that it is reliable because it is the published news of a prestigious university.  Though it is associated with UC Berkeley, it is independent of CHAI.


 * I think it is wholly within the spirit and intention of Wikipedia's notability guidelines to consider these two sources taken together as establishing notability. Consider that Dewritech, a user with over 110k contributions, marked the article as reviewed and only added a third-party maintenance template, implicitly affirming the basic notability of the article.  And this was before I added the article from The Guardian and two other sources.


 * In light of the above, I propose the notability maintenance template be removed.WeyerStudentOfAgrippa (talk) 18:28, 30 December 2019 (UTC)