Talk:Center for Security Policy/Consensus

Page-specific consensus 
 * 1) There is consensus to include the BBC's description of the CSP as "not very highly respected" in the article lead. (RfC, June 2016, July 2017)
 * 2) There is consensus to opt for a syntax similar to "version B" in the following RFC to avoid a "too disparaging" lead. (RfC, Dec 2016, Jan 2017)
 * 3) The "Controversy" section should include that the Center has been criticized for propagating conspiracy theories. (Feb 2017, Feb 2017)
 * 4) The Southern Poverty Law Center is a reliable source for factual information on Wikipedia. (June 2018, WP:SPLC)