Talk:Central Atlas Tamazight/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ·Maunus· ƛ · 09:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)


 * 1. Well-written:
 * Much better prose than the last time around. Still some minor issue with jargon that will probably be an issue if it goes to FA - but not here.

2. Factually accurate and verifiable:
 * Very well referenced.

3. Broad in its coverage:
 * Very broad.

4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without bias.
 * Definitely neutral.

5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day-to-day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
 * No disputes.

6. Illustrated, if possible, by images:
 * Yes.

Conclusions
The article has improved greatly since the last review and I am glad to pass it as a GA.·Maunus· ƛ · 09:26, 30 December 2009 (UTC)