Talk:Central Children's Home of North Carolina

NRHP assessment

 * The hidden message in the WikiProject National Register of Historic Places assessment is confusing and raises far more concerns than benefits. Many times sourcing evidence of "a building" or other structure can only be found in sources that contribute to certain historical aspects outside of such a particular building or structure (Wikipedia subject). These sources still include the subject and editors will see this as a historical repository for that sourced material that might not warrant a stand-alone article.
 * If there is not enough content to supposedly qualify for a "NRHP project edit count inclusion" criterion (none that I am not aware of) it is suggestive that the project be boldly withdrawn and the infobox changed. If this is something requiring a RFC or project discussion, if this is a project sanctioned opinion (consensus) then that should be the direction. To deny the article proper project assessment, simply "because" there is dissatisfaction on the edit count devoted to the NRHP aspect of the subject, does not make sense. Should we ignore the historical significance of a building (structure etc...) to the project or stop including the project from any future articles if the overall edit contribution in one direction is more than that of the particular building(s) or structures on the NRHP list? Otr500 (talk) 14:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)

Image

 * There is an image of the building and marker that would be nice to have on the article. Otr500 (talk) 14:43, 12 December 2018 (UTC)