Talk:Central Coast Mariners FC/GA

1. It is well written. In this respect:
 * (a) it has compelling prose, and is readily comprehensible to non-specialist readers;
 * (b) it follows a logical structure, introducing the topic and then grouping together its coverage of related aspects; where appropriate, it contains a succinct lead section summarising the topic, and the remaining text is organised into a system of hierarchical sections (particularly for longer articles); Done 08:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * (c) it follows the Wikipedia Manual of Style including the list guideline; Done 08:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * (d) necessary technical terms or jargon are briefly explained in the article itself, or an active link is provided. Done 08:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable. In this respect:
 * (a) it provides references to any and all sources used for its material; Done 08:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * (b) the citation of its sources is essential, and the use of inline citations is desirable, although not mandatory; Done 08:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * (c) sources should be selected in accordance with the guidelines for reliable sources; Done 08:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * (d) it contains no elements of original research. Done 08:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

3. It is broad in its coverage. In this respect :
 * (a) it addresses all major aspects of the topic (this requirement is slightly weaker than the "comprehensiveness" required by WP:FAC, and allows shorter articles and broad overviews of large topics to be listed); Done 08:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * (b) it stays focused on the main topic without going into unnecessary details (no non-notable trivia). Done 08:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy. In this respect:
 * (a) viewpoints are represented fairly and without bias; Done 08:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)
 * (b) all significant points of view are fairly presented, but not asserted, particularly where there are or have been conflicting views on the topic. Done 08:38, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

5. It is stable, i.e. it does not change significantly from day to day and is not the subject of ongoing edit wars. This does not apply to vandalism and protection or semi-protection as a result of vandalism, or proposals to split/merge the article content.

6. It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic. In this respect:
 * (a) the images are tagged and have succinct and descriptive captions;
 * (b) a lack of images does not in itself prevent an article from achieving Good Article status.