Talk:Central London Railway/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 10:48, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Initial comments
I've had a quick read through and this article appears to be at or about GA level (or possibly higher). I will now do a detail review, which might take a day or so to complete. During that time I will mostly be highlighting "problems", if any - so this is a somewhat "negative" stage in the overall process. Pyrotec (talk) 17:00, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

This article is a possible WP:FAC and I have no hesitation in awarding GA-status. Congratulations on your acheivements in producing a fine article. Pyrotec (talk) 10:41, 6 April 2010 (UTC)