Talk:Centralway

Copyright issue review
This one is moderately complicated.

It appears OK in early version. Sometime in 2012, possibly starting 1 June, it started incorporating material from this source.

I think we need to revert to the last clean version and rev-del subsequent versions, but I don't have time at the moment to research the borderline between clean and problematic.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  17:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)
 * I've looked closer, and decided that the edits starting on 1 June 2012 were the start of the problem, so I've reverted to the last version before those edits.-- SPhilbrick (Talk)  17:46, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Requested move 09 September 2014

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. DrKiernan (talk) 20:38, 17 September 2014 (UTC)

Centralway → CENTRALWAY – Rebranding – Cwsalo (talk) 13:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). EdJohnston (talk) 21:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * This was filed as a technical move request at WP:RMTR. I've brought it here for discussion, along with two comments that were already posted. EdJohnston (talk) 21:37, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Doesn't this violate WP:ALLCAPS? Clodhopper Deluxe (talk)
 * Oppose per WP:ALLCAPS / MOS:TM. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:40, 9 September 2014 (UTC)


 * Oppose, yes does violate WP:ALLCAPS In ictu oculi (talk) 23:03, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.