Talk:Centre for Missional Leadership

This article has multiple issues
This article is very unacceptable as an encyclopedia article at present. It violates numerous style policies and is obviously being written as a form of advertising. It is also obviously being written by someone closely connected to this particular organisation. Unless these various issues are urgently addressed I will be requesting that the article is promptly deleted. Afterwriting (talk) 10:37, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

To call its Watford office a "campus" is ridiculous. It is an office in a shared block on Watford High Street. The sooner it's deleted the better. 81.131.19.76 (talk) 17:38, 18 November 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 one external links on Centre for Missional Leadership. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101029003144/http://ctlibrary.com/ch/2006/issue89/7.32.html to http://www.ctlibrary.com/ch/2006/issue89/7.32.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101030111020/http://www.lausanne.org:80/issue-business-as-mission/overview.html to http://www.lausanne.org/issue-business-as-mission/overview.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110717021119/http://www.lst.ac.uk/smartweb/history/history to http://www.lst.ac.uk/smartweb/history/history

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:31, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Updated Page
Hello fellow editors,

This page still receives a warning at the top denoting it is written like an add and possibly not notable. However, after reviewing the page (along with several other editors who have worked on it since that notice was put in place,) it is clear the issues have been addressed. Considering it's international news recognition and mention by several celebrities, I am more than comfortable saying it is notable. Additionally, all phrases 'worded like an advertisement' have since been removed. CherriGasoline (talk) 10:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)