Talk:Centre for Social Justice

Non neutrality
Not sure that this page is particularly neutral - highlights the organisation's "credibility" and states that the CSJ Alliance provides "an expert voice". These points would be better supported by a citation from outside the CSJ. Voxtrot (talk) 13:02, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

The article reads like self promotion. And no one should use the word "independent" without saying independent of *what*.81.131.11.254 (talk) 15:44, 10 March 2013 (UTC)


 * I have removed the word 'independent' - but this article has a lot of problems. Looking through the edit history it has been *extensively* edited by accounts associated with the CSJ in an attempt to present this think tank as neutral rather than a mouthpiece of right wing MPs and lobbyists. e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/62.49.168.65 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Paul.at.CSJ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Centreforsocialjustice The last two at least are incredibly transparent. What is the usual action when the integrity of a page is compromised like this? Casiotonetalk 08:12, 11 September 2013 (UTC)


 * I've removed all the fluff (which was most of the article). At this point nothing should be added that does not cite an independent secondary reliable source. There has been a lot of conflict of interest editing going on in this article and it needs to stop. SQGibbon (talk) 02:32, 13 September 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Centre for Social Justice. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131004214007/https://www.politicshome.com/uk/article/38572/csj_backs_gangs_plan_and_calls_for_relentless_effort_to_make_streets_safe.html to https://www.politicshome.com/uk/article/38572/csj_backs_gangs_plan_and_calls_for_relentless_effort_to_make_streets_safe.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130714230439/http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/blog/think-tank-awards-2013-winners/ to https://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/blog/think-tank-awards-2013-winners/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:39, 18 November 2016 (UTC)