Talk:Cephalic Carnage/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass or Fail:

I expanded that section a bit, but I don't have sufficient sources that provide more information. The early history of the band has not been documented in detail. So I fused the first 2 subsections into 1. I think it is ok.

I did search in Flickr, but all the pictures over there are copyrighted. There is not much I can do about this. However, GA criteria do not require images if there are no available. So this should not be problem.

I hope this is satisfactory :) --  LYKANTROP    ✉  09:33, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm, okay. Passed.--  C  anniba loki  16:10, 21 July 2009 (UTC)