Talk:Cerium(IV) oxide

Untitled
The statement that Ce2O3 is more stable than CeO2 is based on incorrect interpretation of the thermodynamic data. Yes, the standard enthalpy of formation of Ce2O3 is higher, but more Ce and O atoms are involved in the reaction as well. If you do the calculation correctly you will see that CeO2 is actually the more stable oxide. 131.211.44.116 (talk) 08:37, 18 September 2014 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 11:10, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Cerium(IV) oxide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131029204441/http://courses.chem.indiana.edu/c360/documents/thermodynamicdata.pdf to http://courses.chem.indiana.edu/c360/documents/thermodynamicdata.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090830011704/http://www.solarpaces.org:80/Tasks/Task2/HPST.HTM to http://www.solarpaces.org/Tasks/Task2/HPST.HTM

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 17:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Ceryllium
I ran across the term "ceryllium", associated with "ceryllium oxide" which was identified as CeO2. It appears to be a trade name for cerium oxide, but I couldn't confirm this. If anyone has anything on this, perhaps it should be mentioned here as a name. Dismalscholar (talk) 06:31, 12 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cerium(IV) oxide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130302081012/http://www.nanopartikel.info/cms/lang/en/Wissensbasis/Cerdioxid to http://www.nanopartikel.info/cms/lang/en/Wissensbasis/Cerdioxid

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:03, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Is >30% covalent...
...but still is written with the oxidation number in parens. Am I missing something? Alfa-ketosav (talk) 16:23, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
 * With a melting point of 2400 °C, it certainly seems like a textbook predominantly ionic compound. Where do you get ">30% covalent" from? Double sharp (talk) 05:11, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Report from Chemical Abstracts
In a search for "ceria" we get this information: 43437 references, of which 28269 have appeared since 2008 (about 7 publications/reports per day), of which 431 are reviews. So we really need to stick to WP:SECONDARY. --Smokefoot (talk) 23:02, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Mineral name
One of the names of the related mineral, that appears in the "Glossary of chemical formulae", is wrong, as it goes "cerianite". There is no such mineral. The only correct name is: cerianite-(Ce). The more no other cerianites are known until now (and it is likely we never get known any other "cerianites").Eudialytos (talk) 12:37, 11 November 2020 (UTC)