Talk:Cerro Tuzgle/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Sainsf (talk · contribs) 07:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi! Will get to this soon. Sainsf &lt;^&gt; Feel at home 07:12, 26 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Lead
 * I think the details in the first line should be repeated in the main article.
 * Any idea on how the volcano gets its name?
 * "Crater" may be linked
 *  Sulfur was formerly mined on the mountain Since when has this stopped?


 * Regional setting
 * (La Negra formation[6]) This is generally written as (La Negra formation)[6]
 * It would be good to link "faulting" and "Puna". Puna is linked in the next section, but this is the first mention
 *  16 and 28° south add "latitude"
 * 20 and 24° latitude add "south"
 *  geochemistry and geographic indicators Should it be "geochemical"?
 *  travertine deposits (24°10′S 66°40′W) Why are coordinates provided only for this?
 * from 4,400 metres (14,400 ft) altitude south to 4,100 metres (13,500 ft) altitude north What is "altitude north/south"?


 * Local setting
 * Ordovican is linked twice and Miocene is a duplink
 * An image or two more would go well with the text.
 * A low gravity field anomaly is also found in the area This is something interesting. Anything more on this?
 * Can we have subsections for better navigation?
 * northnortheast-southsouthwest  Can be written as "N-NE to S-SW"

Addressed a number of suggestions. Several notes:
 * 1) Not sure how to integrate the first sentence into the article. Probably something in the "local" section.
 * It has to be integrated, I leave it to you to decide which place would hold it best.


 * 1) There does not appear to be information on when the mines were abandoned or what the etymology is.
 * 2) Probably better to stick with "geochemistry", it can be used as a nount like that.
 * 3) The travertine deposits are a bit away from the volcano, but I think that we could lose that citation.
 * 4) Not sure what subsections to use. Maybe a "petrology" section for the chemistry-related info?
 * Alright, do what is possible.

That's for now.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:33, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Linked the gravity anomaly thing; not as interesting as it sounds, unfortunately!

Thanks for the quick response. I have struck or the resolved issues. I'll list the rest of the comments in a few days, a bit busy now. Cheers! Sainsf (talk · contribs) 17:04, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
 * Worked somewhat crudely on the remaining two issues.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 18:59, 3 May 2016 (UTC)

Alright, those done, here are a few more comments from the rest of the article.
 * Link rhyodacite (Composition and origin)
 * Duplinks: thermobarometry (Composition and origin), ignimbrite, Pleistocene, Holocene (Activity), Miocene (Geothermal area and sulfur)
 * a company named Geotermina Andina What sort of a company? Mining?
 * are already exploited "already being"?
 * Puna should be linked at first mention.
 * The climate of the Puna is arid nowadays "nowadays" is implied, and thus redundant
 * What are orbital changes?

That should be it. Sainsf (talk · contribs) 06:10, 4 May 2016 (UTC)
 * I think I got these.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:35, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

Very well, this can now be promoted. Cheers, Sainsf  (talk · contribs) 05:53, 5 May 2016 (UTC)