Talk:Cerulean warbler

Warbler: funny name
warblers have funny names! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.108.107.131 (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Cerulean warbler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20031203163112/http://www.birds.cornell.edu:80/cewap/ to http://birds.cornell.edu/cewap/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:38, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

List-defined refs
Hi! I have been trying to get the References segregator to work, in order to convert the article to list-defined references, as the way I've done it (inline ref definitions) is very messy. However, I can't seem to get the script to work. I'd greatly appreciate it if someone could help with that - I'd absolutely rename refs to sensible titles, if only someone were able to run the script over. Thanks! Sub31k (talk) 14:32, 3 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Well done to this article. Can you improve the referencing on ref 52. Thanks. BloatedBun (talk) 22:22, 3 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Could you please link the passage in the article, so I can find what needs to be done? Thanks! Sub31k (talk) 02:03, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I don't think its necessary now since the GA reviewer thinks its fine. Congrats on your first GA thou. BloatedBun (talk) 12:03, 5 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Eh, one could always stand to improve things. Cheers. Sub31k (talk) 03:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I meant the ref 50 that needs ref improvement. Anyway, if youre planning another bird article for GA, I'm happy to help you clean a bit like at this article. BloatedBun (talk) 12:16, 6 June 2022 (UTC)

Curious George
@BloatedBunI see that the Curious George depiction of this species might have been somewhat poorly sourced on my end. My reasoning for having those two is that the journal article makes it clear that the episode in question has relevance to the species ("children's television program" cites this Curious George episode), while the programming guide deepens the connection and provides the sourcing to explain the details of how the warbler is portrayed. If this is WP:SYNTH, let me know! Thank you. Sub31k (talk) 00:54, 4 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Ill leave it to GA reviewer. My only concern is the ref 51, the referencing could be improved. That's all. BloatedBun (talk) 03:56, 4 June 2022 (UTC)