Talk:Cervical ganglia

Merge
I really think the cervical ganglia could all live happily on one page, which would make it easier to show their relations to one another. Plus I think it's kind of logical to go looking for cervical ganglia and then for superior/middle/inferior, in the same way you would look up cranial nerves and then read about each one in turn. What do YOU think? (If there's no comments within a couple of weeks (and I remember) I'll merge the three.)Mmoneypenny 19:05, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Oppose merge, but if you wanted to create an overview article about the cervical ganglia with links to the subpages, I doubt anyone would object. --Arcadian 22:55, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with the merges. As it stands the current articles will probably not make it past being stubs. Merging the bunch would at least allow a better overview of what they do together. Radagast83 23:00, 26 November 2006 (UTC)