Talk:Cetiosauriscus/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Wilhelmina Will (talk · contribs) 06:06, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

: The article possessed a handful of minor grammatical errors when I began this review, but nothing I was not able to fix. Aside from that it follows the policies on prose, content and structure, and with my modifications, grammar. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 14:35, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

: The article uses a sizable quantity of reliable, published sources. No original reasearch looks to have been incorporated, and the content is laden with frequent citations. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 14:34, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)
 * (c)

: The article seems to cover all aspects of the topic which are relevant for encyclopedic inclusion. No irrelevant details appear to have been applied. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 14:32, 23 January 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

. The article does not demonstrate any bias towards or against its subject. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 14:31, 23 January 2014 (UTC) . Looking at the edit history as far back as October, none of the editing which has occurred since then appears disruptive in any way. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 06:26, 20 January 2014 (UTC) : The images are all validly licensed and do not violate any fair use-related laws. They also serve clear and relevant informative and illustrative purposes. Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 06:29, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
 * (a)
 * (b)

With the above mentioned grammatical tweaks, I now feel this article satisfies the GA criteria. Congratulations! Is it the end already? It felt like we were just getting started! (talk) 14:36, 23 January 2014 (UTC)