Talk:Chadra, Chad

Verification
per WP:GEOLAND, we cannot use a census tract to establish notability. The translated title of the PDF you used to support removal of the PROD reads: Second GENERAL census of POPULATION and HABITAT. It is not an acceptable source. We can do one of two things - you self-revert deletion of the PROD, and if not, then I can take it to AfD. I prefer to let you make the choice. Atsme 📞📧 15:34, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * I wasn't suggesting the PDF source established notability, just that it attested that Chadra was a variant spelling (alongside Cheddra). Here are some more sources for the existence of the place: . I don't think a PROD is appropriate at this point, but I'm not sure if it meets WP:GEOLAND either. Feel free to take it to AfD. –&#8239;Joe (talk) 16:42, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . The more I think about it, and after looking at additional sources using Chedra instead of Chadra, it is a populated settlement with some geographic significance. I zoomed in on Google maps, and saw a rather substantial housing development. Atsme 📞📧 18:32, 16 November 2017 (UTC)