Talk:Chains (geological site)

GCR site?
Where is the reference that demonstrates that this is a GCR site - and for what? Surely not for its biology which is how it reads currently. cheers Geopersona (talk) 21:03, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The English Heritage data sheet says it is a GCR site.&mdash; Rod talk 21:07, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Strictly speaking, the citation says that the SSSI includes the (separately defined) Chains GCR. It would be worth locating that separate reference so that it could be quoted. I wasn't meaning to question whether there was a GCR but it ought to be evidenced in the article. It would be useful to know why the area has been designated for its geological interest whereas the citation is principally concerned with the areas biological interest. cheersGeopersona (talk) 21:35, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Is this link the one you mean?&mdash; Rod talk 22:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Nice one Rodw - yes, it would be worth adding as an additional reference. It would be something that folks might then like to follow up themselves if they had a particular interest - certainly my own interest has been sparked. best wishes Geopersona (talk) 05:16, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chains (geological site). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061013121549/http://www.english-nature.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1006541.pdf to http://www.english-nature.org.uk/citation/citation_photo/1006541.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)