Talk:Chakma Circle

Possible hoax article
This is referenced to unreliable sources. Can anybody check it out properly? Is it even real? --DanielRigal (talk) 00:18, 2 May 2015 (UTC)


 * After reading this, I am coming to the conclusion that this is massively oversold if not outright WP:Bollocks. This seems to be a clan chiefdom not a royal family. I see no evidence of a historic nation or kingdom. I am inclined towards an AfD of all the alleged "kings" who do not demonstrate genuine additional notability and either including this article in the AfD or cutting it down to what can proven and shown to be notable. --DanielRigal (talk) 11:48, 2 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I am going to start by sweeping up everything on the subject into one place: Category:Chakma Royal Family. That way we will have an idea of how much we are dealing with. --DanielRigal (talk) 12:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

I am also going to be purging the non RS pseudo-references as I feel that they are linkspam for blogs and social media operated by the editor who is adding them. --DanielRigal (talk) 00:22, 3 May 2015 (UTC)


 * I'd support starting an AfD in a few days (or later). — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 15:53, 7 May 2015 (UTC)