Talk:Chambers Street–World Trade Center/Park Place (New York City Subway)

Image
Can someone if they in the area take a picture of the Eighth Avenue Line platforms since the image on the article is being used in both infoboxes. 205.245.189.151 (talk) 01:12, 15 October 2010 (UTC) That was me. Gfoley 4 &#124;  Wanna chat?  01:13, 15 October 2010 (UTC)

A complex
> New York City Subway rapid transit station

It isn't a station, it's a complex. Fix it pls. 79.179.237.166 (talk) 13:40, 20 May 2011 (UTC) That was me. Vcohen (talk) 14:00, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
 * – Thanks for asking! Acps110 (talk • contribs) 21:05, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

Some problems
I see some problems here, but my knowledge is not enough to fix them.

1. In the References there are 2 lines that must be in the '2005 fire' paragraph.

2. In all other articles dedicated to complexes, the station parts are called '... platform(s)'. This article is the only one whose parts aren't called so. (And, if anybody fixes it, it's necessary to change the redirections that point here.)

3. There are 2 complexes that have no own page: Bleecker Street / Broadway – Lafayette Street and 14th Street / Sixth Avenue.

Thank you.

Vcohen (talk) 14:18, 5 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Well, I've moved the first link. The second one is dead.
 * Vcohen (talk) 17:08, 6 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Acps110, thank you.
 * Vcohen (talk) 14:57, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Two stations, not one
The A/C/E platforms are presented here as one station with one infobox titled "station", and only somewhere in the text it's written that the station is actually two stations. The same problem exists in the Canal Street (New York City Subway) article with the N/Q/R platforms. Only counting each of these stations as two, one can get the total number of 468 stations.

Is there any chance to change the infoboxes and write "two stations" instead of "station", or anything like this? The current situation is misleading.

Vcohen (talk) 16:29, 30 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I completely agree with you. I've noticed this myself and World Trade Center is for the E train as Chambers Street is for the A & C.  Considering how long this page could get if the infoboxes are changed, I recommend splitting the article up.  68.44.51.49 (talk) 21:22, 16 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Another solution is to add station layouts to all infoboxes, look here please. Note the two doubled layouts at the end that are intended for the two above mentioned pairs of stations. Vcohen (talk) 21:41, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Why isn't Oculus a stand alone article?
Doesn't this work of art merit its own article, a la Life Underground? --CmdrDan (talk) 00:24, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 one external links on Chambers Street–World Trade Center/Park Place (New York City Subway). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090606000037/http://www.stationreporter.net:80/wtc.htm to http://www.stationreporter.net/wtc.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110606084241/http://mta.info/mta/aft/permanentart/permart.html?agency=nyct&line=2&station=26&xdev=2900 to http://mta.info/mta/aft/permanentart/permart.html?agency=nyct&line=2&station=26&xdev=2900

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:35, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:163rd Street–Amsterdam Avenue (IND Eighth Avenue Line) which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 18:18, 24 February 2017 (UTC)

Removing the first "Clear" template
Greetings and felicitations. I'd like to remove the first Clear template to allow the infobox to run into the "Station layout" section and thus run alongside the table. This would reduce the height of the article and the (in my 1600 pixel browser window) massive amount of white space—more than a screen's worth—that the current layout entails. (With my setup this [would] save roughly 600 pixels of space.) Comments? —DocWatson42 (talk) 04:51, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * or anyone else? —DocWatson42 (talk) 09:50, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
 * I'm fine with that. epicgenius (talk) 15:10, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Merge with Cortlandt Street?
Now that a free connection has been opened these two stations, perhaps the two articles should be merged? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hhm8 (talk • contribs)
 * You are welcome to this discussion. Vcohen (talk) 10:19, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the pointer! --Hhm8 (talk) 05:28, 9 April 2018 (UTC)