Talk:Chancroid

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 July 2019 and 23 August 2019. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kelventran, Pharmacystudentkm, Lauren.chen, Clphan.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 17:10, 16 January 2022 (UTC)

Advice
wt am i supposed to do i have this disease and if anyone can hlep me plz e-mail me at and the subject should be i will help. -- —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.161.203.166 (talk • contribs) 16:02, 24 May 2007


 * Sorry, Wikipedia does not dispense medical advice. Please see a doctor. -- MarcoTolo 00:45, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

Typo
Common locations in women

In women the most common location for ulcers is the labia majora. "Kissihahahahng ulcers" may develop.

Is this an actual word 'Kissihahahahng ulcers' or is it just a typo? --Weeddude 17:37, 26 September 2007 (UTC)

WPMED assessment
Assessed start class. May need to be merged with chancre and/or other pages on this topic, or needs a discussion of how a chancroid differs from a chancre and why it is specific to the genitals. Etc. --Una Smith (talk) 19:57, 23 November 2007 (UTC)


 * have added comparison with chancre; they are different conditions. Could be merged into an article on genital ulceration, but the two conditions should not be in the same article otherwise... Russthomas1515 (talk) 11:50, 16 November 2008 (UTC)

Foundations II, 2019, - Group 2B Goals
We are group 2 and some of us will be working on the article for the next few weeks. Some changes we want to make are adding more details to prognosis with a proper source. Additionally, we want to expand on the information of the pathology of the disease. We also want to add in updates to the "History" portion with any updates on treatment. Kelventran (talk) 21:45, 30 July 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review
 * Do the group’s edits substantially improve the article as described in the Wikipedia peer review “Guiding framework”? -- Yes
 * Has the group achieved its overall goals for improvement? -- Yes
 * Does the draft submission reflect a neutral point of view? If not, specify… -- Yes, the information presented is neutral and strictly informative. Lyjanicee (talk) 21:17, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Are the points included verifiable with cited secondary sources that are freely available? If not, specify… -- Yes Huyha63 (talk) 21:21, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Are the edits formatted consistent with Wikipedia’s manual of style? If not, specify… -- Yes Laurafansun (talk) 21:16, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
 * Is there any evidence of plagiarism or copyright violation? If yes, specify… -- No

Sharonluong (talk) 21:08, 5 August 2019 (UTC)