Talk:Chandi

Untitled

 * This is a copy of the dicussion on the talk:Caṇḍī moved to this talk page by user:Redtigerxyz because the article Caṇḍī is moved here now. Please do not remove this notice.  --Redtigerxyz (talk) 11:11, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

Chandi as Parvati wife of Siva
Someone has been repeatedly changing the first paragraph to say that Candi is an aspect of Parvati and is the consort of Siva. Candi is envisaged as the Supreme Reality and the conglomeration of the powers of all Gods including Siva in Devi Mahatmya. Frustrating.--Sankarrukku (talk) 11:52, 10 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Chandi is considered as Supreme reality in Devi Mahatmya. Elsewhere, Chandi is considered as an epithet of Durga or Kali or Parvati. This second opinion should also be included. The article is written only through the Devi Mahatmya prospective at the moment. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:44, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Move page to Chandi
IMO, the article's name should Chandi (the usual spelling in English), and not the IAST Caṇḍī like the FA Ganesha is named so and not Ganeśa.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 17:12, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

The article was named Caṇḍī because the name Chandi was redirecting to Durga. I had made a request in the Hinduism-related topics notice board.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Hinduism-related_topics_notice_board#Ca.E1.B9.87.E1.B8.8D.C4.AB_or_Chandi

I would like to created a page on Caṇḍī or Chandi, the name of the Goddess who is the ultimate reality in Devi Mahatmyam. There is no page with the name Caṇḍī. However Chandi which is the common usage for this deity redirects to Durga. This needs to be undone.

I would welcome suggestions as to how I can go about it.

Thanks,

--Sankarrukku 13:33, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

Article on Caṇḍī created.--Sankarrukku 02:24, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Does anyone read the notice board?

It may be noted that Chandi and Chandika redirects to Caṇḍī, at the moment. I had redirected those links to Caṇḍī page as soon as the page was formed.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:41, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Mantra
The mantra "oṁ aiṁ hrīṁ klīṁ cāmuṇḍayāi vicce" invokes Chamunda, not Chandi.--Redtigerxyz (talk) 11:16, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

This Mantra is called Chandi Navakshari. Any book on Mantra would testify to this. Chamundai does not mean Chamunda. Of course you will not believe me. I had written the article to provide information to the user on the net. I find that I have to spend a lot of time trying to convince the other Wikipedians who count. It is just not worth the effort. I give up. So quote an acronym and do whatever pleases you.--Sankarrukku (talk) 18:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)


 * By the basic knowedledge of Sanskrit, anyone can tell that cāmuṇḍayāi is the dative singular of Chamunda and not Chandi. --Redtigerxyz (talk) 04:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Mantra is not language, but meta-language and therefore does not function like a word. In fact Mantra as Jan gond pointed out,does not depend on its conventional meaning in Sanskrit to gain significance nor does it resemble its object symbolically. -- Auspicious Wisdom by Douglas Renfrew Brooks Page 83Sankarrukku —Preceding undated comment was added at 09:37, 2 January 2009 (UTC).

Vanishing Trick
BTW I get no credit for making any contributions to this page. A good vanishing trick. --Sankarrukku (talk) 18:25, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Chandi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060505210454/http://www.blessingsonthenet.com:80/newtemple/temple.asp?serialno=1&tempid=T027&desctitle=Introduction to http://www.blessingsonthenet.com/newtemple/temple.asp?serialno=1&tempid=T027&desctitle=Introduction

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 08:49, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://books.google.ca/books?id=_aBxZRMUHw0C&pg=PA153. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. MrLinkinPark333 (talk) 03:28, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Unlinked shortened footnotes
The article has shortened footnotes but these are not linked to any citations. Furthermore, there is a variety of citation styles. Most do not use citation templates, but many of the references do use them.

To link the shortened footnotes, I will employ citation templates as per WP:CITEVAR, as this is the easiest way to provide citations to which the sfn template can link. I will also add bibliographic & other parameters as appropriate. Peaceray (talk) 02:21, 5 February 2024 (UTC)


 * ✅ Peaceray (talk) 22:13, 5 February 2024 (UTC)