Talk:Chandroth Vasudevan Radhakrishnan

Hi, The reason cited for proposing my article for deletion is 'Insufficient Notability'. Kindly note that a detailed profile on CV Radhakrishnan has been published in The Hindu & The New Indian Express which are two of the leading English dailies in India. Additionally, an article published in The Deccan Herald also has now been cited as a reference. If there is any issue in the way they have been cited, I humbly request that amendments be suggested so that it can be done accordingly. CV Radhakrishnan is a personality who has brought in a lot of transformation in his field of operations and this will be evident by simply searching his name online. I am relatively new to wikipedia and this is my first draft. I hope that my inexperience will not result in a wikipedia worthy profile being deleted. So I request whoever is reviewing to kindly reconsider the proposal for deletion. Also, if there is any specific content that needs to be removed, I will do so as advised. Also, only recently the page has been moved into the Main article space. As long as it remains in the main page, those people who have been influenced by him will be able to contribute further to the content. Once again, humbly requesting a favourable response. Rishikesan T (talk) 13:02, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

I agree the CV Radhakrishnan is notable. Light rays from the sun (talk) 07:40, 31 December 2021 (UTC)