Talk:Changzhi Li

Li Changzhi or Changzhi Li?
Hi. I moved the article from Changzhi Li to Li Changzhi because of WP:ZHNAME. However, I've been informed on my talk page that Changzhi Li might be the right name, and, after checking this article's sources, I agree with the idea. @Limanarui33.1982, since you're this article's creator and main contributor, what do you think? (talk | contribs) 01:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello!
 * Thank you for your question. Professor Li is Changzhi Li in westen way. Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 08:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for answering. To clarify, do you think the name of the article be Li Changzhi or Changzhi Li?  (talk | contribs) 08:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Changzhi Li Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 08:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I've moved and edited the article. Thank you!  (talk | contribs) 08:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 08:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The article stil mention "This article has multiple issues. ". Can you help me identify them, please? Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 08:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * It seems that the issues are:
 * This biography of a living person needs additional citations for verification.
 * This article may rely excessively on sources too closely associated with the subject, potentially preventing the article from being verifiable and neutral.
 * The neutrality of this article is disputed.
 * (talk | contribs) 10:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * There are 19 different sources. How many are reliable?Moreover Wikipedia even question the date of birth!!! Do they need a birth certificate?!! I deleted it and only left the year....Additionaly I found several other biographies of other scientists with 1 (ONE) reference that didn´t even work!
 * Of course the sources are closely associated of the subject, otherwise they were not references of the subject.
 * Don´t understand what it can be not neutral speach. Every sentence is proofed in official entitie´s links, is as objective as it could be.
 * Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 12:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * The issue is there's almost no reliable independent coverage about him. Most, if not all, of the sources cited are from places he worked at.  (talk | contribs) 13:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I really can not understand. It´s because the references are from places where he work or worked that they are reliable...no?!
 * moreover we are talking about universities, international organizations and scholar!
 * what woukd be more reliable? newspapers?! Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 13:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * See WP:RS and WP:SELFPUBLISHED. There are very little third-party sources cited in the article.  (talk | contribs) 13:36, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * check this profile: Almudena Suarez as an example. This professor only has 2 references exactly from the site as mine, the IEEE.org  and 2 ISBN concerning her books. And there is no issues mentioned when one enter this profile... I tried to put several diffrent sources and don´t know what else to do to overcome the comments.... Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 13:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
 * I´m sorry but still dont understand. I cited the following third party sources to validate the existance of Professor: several IEEE sites; several universities; publishers, on line newspapers, NSF site.
 * What is the minimun sites request to delete the box on the top concerning This article has multiple issues?
 * Thank you Limanarui33.1982 (talk) 13:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)