Talk:Chaos (Sonic the Hedgehog)

trivia or not?
should I put in the trivia or another section in the artical that in sonic battle when chaos 0 uses his running attack he forms a mouth with sharp teeth that resembles a sharks mouth and that means it might mean he could speak besides somehow useing telepethy of some sort.--Crypto 138 01:19, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

I doubt him forming a mouth has any real effect on his ability to communicate to others, it's more likly just a minipulation of his body, as Chaos has proven himself to have a noticeable ability to change his body structure. BassxForte 02:10, 11 March 2007 (UTC)

Plus,sonic battle is noncanon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.194.7.41 (talk) 02:50, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Deleted content
Will the person who deleted my infomation about Chaos being the most powerful character in the series please post here, I would like you to know that it is stated in official mate

Chaos images
Made images of Chaos' forms switch sides, after encountering a nasty bug only evident at large screen resolutions, such as 1280x1024. (basically everyone with a modern LCD display.) Here is the link. Scroll down to Perfect Chaos image and watch how the text in "Sonic the Comic" hides behind the image. Ouch. --DavidHOzAu 05:53, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Artificial Chaos
Can anyone add info on these guys in the article? --DrBat 22:49, 19 July 2006 (UTC)


 * It's been added for quite a while now. A picture of one would be nice though. 83.252.141.112 00:58, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

Is Chaos really the main enemy in Sonic Adventure?
I'm kind of confused. Because if Chaos is the chief enemy in the game, then it's kind of using Eggman. But then again Eggman released Chaos so that he may use it to rule the world. Can you please tell me?
 * Eggman was basically using it, but it grew too powerful for him to control.
 * It's probably the main enemy, because it's the last boss you fight in the game, and most of the game revolves around it. --DrBat 17:49, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
 * Eggman is the main enemy in Sonic Adventure, as he is in most games. Despite the fact that Eggman was a very villainous character in Sonic '06 versus past titles, Mephiles is actually the main villain. Why did I mention this? The difference is overall. Chaos was under Eggman's control the entire game so he wasn't the main villain. He simply was the final boss. Final boss =/= main villain. Most times that is the case, but not always. Chaos simply got too powerful at the end of the game and usurped Eggman's authority. --Ultima 01:05, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

Chaos never had any intrest in Eggman's plans, he only wanted the chaos emeralds, after all, he was in his 0 form whe he rebeled. Vilerocks 01:07, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

total chaos!
I think it's a bit weird that chaos has it's own page in the 'villains' section of characters. He's not that important of a character, or, at least, not more important than the Biolizard and Iblis! If chaos has it's own article, Iblis and Biolizard should have their own too. Otherwise, Chaos should be put under 'Milleceanous'(i can't spell right now.sry.)Superbub 01:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

Okay, I just checked, and I saw Biolizard has it's own article too. I'll talk with the folks on that page...see what they think....Superbub 01:19, 23 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Chaos was a character that showed up frequently in Sonic Adventure and has had multiple cameos in other Sonic games, unlike Biolizard. He's deserves his own page more than say Big the Cat, Fang the Sniper, Emerl or Tikal the Echidna who have their own pages any way. --Zikar 01:28, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I agree about Tikal--but, I thought she was moved to 'Milleceanous'(or whatever. i really can't spell)! Aaaaaaaaaaargh! Big the Cat is an obese monstrosity; i don't know what sega was thinking. I'll tell the talk pages to move those two. Fang only has a page because he's still on sega's sonic site, and ,thus, is still considered a character until sega offically declares him scrapped. And, Emerl was like a son to Sonic! And I thought he reappeared in Sonic Advance 3....or his parts, at least...

Back to Chaos; He's a bit more popular than Biolizard, obviously, but Iblis should have it's own page if Chaos still has his. All I am saying is that Chaos, along with all the info, should be added to 'Deites'(I can't even spell that right, can I?!?).Sry if I forgot to mention that earlier...I guess I'm having trouble connecting with my brain tonight....Superbub 02:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I think that amount of info would be far more essential to determining an article that appearances. Chaos's article seems quite in-depth and is very essential to the all-around plot of the series, making him a very important key character despite the fact that he's only appeared in-game three times. Iblis has just about nothing. Tikal has only appeared twice, with only one plot appearance, but likewise, she is a key character in the history of the series, and therefore, I think that she deserves her own article. --Ultima 01:02, 10 June 2007 (UTC)

News flash for Ultima, there's actually very little info about Chao's role in the plot of the game. In fact, the part of the article that talks about his other media appearances has more information then the part explains his role in Sonic Adventure. Chao's article, when it comes to plot information, is hardly in depth. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.28.67.168 (talk) 01:27, 22 September 2007 (UTC) Comment was left by person that is now FiercedietylinkX

Chaos the Chao?
I've beat the game, read his REAL Character Profile that's listed as the source for saying Chaos was once a chao and still don't recall anything saying point blank Chaos was a chao. I'm taking this bit out of the article.


 * It not from the games, it from Sonic Team themselves!  Doktor  Wilhelm   00:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

He's a chao.Mess around in the chao garden and your chao might turn into him. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.194.7.41 (talk) 02:58, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Chaos is a lake
Added the fact to Perfect Chaos that he is not just the head, he is a lake. That is why he is able to flood the whole city. The water levels were perfectly normal, until he came, at which point his water flooded the sewers and the whole city in the end. This is also why his head is able to sink into the water and reappear somewhere else during the final battle and during the cutscene where he appears out of the building. Chaos is not just the head, he is most of the water below the head as well, and the head is just relocating itself in the water. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.53.225 (talk) 23:36, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * I always thought of it as Perfect Chaos controling the available water, there's nothing to say that it is a lake anywhere!  Doktor  Wilhelm   00:07, 29 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The available water was not enough to flood the city. It was the available water + Chaos that flooded the city. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.15.53.225 (talk) 01:12, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Though, the Available water was The Sea! Station Square is right next to the sea, so Chaos could just control that!  Doktor  Wilhelm   01:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Its an interesting thing to debate. If he did use the sea I would expect to see some fishes when battling him but there were none. Fwooshlewooshle (talk) 23:03, 22 January 2008 (UTC)


 * With the available graphics, I don't think it was possible to how loads of fish, and besides Chaos could have displaced the water, but left the sea life unharmed!? The lake idea, mean that Chaos must not actuall be water, but something that doesn't mix with actual water (which I believe could be right), but this would all be speculation, WP:OR and WP:POV, and doesn't go into the article.  Doktor  Wilhelm   23:18, 22 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Chaos 1 unknown.png
Image:Chaos 1 unknown.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:53, 13 February 2008 (UTC)