Talk:Chaperone DnaJ

Untitled
I think that Hsp40 should be merged into this page. The two pages describe the same family of proteins. Unless there are any objections I think that Chaperone DnaJ is the best name for this page, this name seems to be more widely used than Hsp40. The article also needs some clarification as from the first paragraph it is unclear if this is about DnaJ or DnaK --RE73 (talk) 11:57, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think they could be merged (one of them is about C-terminal domain of the same protein), but we need to keep both Pfam boxes in the article to provide proper linking to other resources.Biophys (talk) 12:26, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I will definitely be keeping both Pfam infoboxes, and there is a third which I intend to add for the central domain PF00684 --RE73 (talk) 14:58, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
 * I've now done the merge, and will sort out the Pfam infoboxes soon. --RE73 (talk) 11:27, 16 August 2011 (UTC)