Talk:Charles Brooke, Rajah of Sarawak

Untitled
Dear authors, I was searching for information, and found a little article about a British what-ever who was a Rajah. How come this, why, what did he do, and so on... hey people this is the XXI century 'common era' 80.56.122.57 (talk) 14:43, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

John criticism
What did John criticise James about? Someone needs to add to this section either here or in the James Brooke article. I probably learned it before but can't remember. Nil Einne 12:53, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Name of article
I am most unhappy that the article name at the present does not in any way reflect his position as ruler of Sarawak. However, that's the position he is most promonent for, and actually the reason why he has article. With the present name, this article is easily confused (or lost) with and among various and sundry gentlemen of almost any English-speaking world. I request the naming convention for titled people to be taken into use in naming this. Shilkanni 04:31, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

Here here! I quite agree. This is happening to other articles of the Royal familiy of Sarawak too.--Couter-revolutionary 11:30, 20 November 2006 (UTC)


 * I agree the title of the article should contain the royal title. --SandyDancer 02:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Apparently not fixed, can someone help me move this to Charles of Sarawak per the Manual of Style. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 17:59, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
 * I strongly oppose this unjustified and disruptive move. Septentrionalis PMAnderson 03:47, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Calm down and please remember to assume good faith. --Counter-revolutionary (talk) 11:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC)
 * Per the agreement on WP:RM (see ), I am going to move this to Charles Brooke, Rajah of Sarawak. Neıl ☎  11:20, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

British citizen?
What was his nationality, if not British he wouldn't be allowed to use the prefix sir but could use post nominals.--Counter-revolutionary (talk) 22:36, 24 December 2007 (UTC)