Talk:Charles Chvala

Caucus scandal
I removed contentious material re so-called caucus scandal. Most fair-minded observers note that the scandal itself was overblown. Articles such as this provide some perspective. I would argue that if we are to include this material on a living person, the content should include controversial context of the scandal itself. WondermentDaily (talk) 18:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
 * The trial and conviction was reported in the new media and is public knowledge; this was cited in the article. Thank you-RFD (talk) 11:31, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * I added two additional citations: 1.-a Milwaukee Sentinel Journal article concerning Charles Chvala. The article mentioned the conviction; 2.-a Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision about the trial and conviction. Thank you-RFD (talk) 12:21, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
 * There is no doubting this scandal happened. I object to not providing context and the lack of a fuller bio. The scandal does not tell the whole story of the person, but your edits don't reflect that. If you want to help, please expand the article itself. Also, please keep facts accurate re years served. Thank you.WondermentDaily (talk) 16:08, 16 June 2020 (UTC)